noting that Rule 15(d) motions should be granted "[u]nless undue prejudice to the opposing party will result"
Summary of this case from Carlson v. U.S. Postal ServiceNo. 86-1702.
June 15, 1987.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 804 F. 2d 1113.
noting that Rule 15(d) motions should be granted "[u]nless undue prejudice to the opposing party will result"
Summary of this case from Carlson v. U.S. Postal Serviceremanding for retrial at which the defendant would be free to make choice to represent himself or proceed with counsel
Summary of this case from State v. FigueroaFull title:UNITED DAIRYMEN OF ARIZONA v. LASALVIA ET UX
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 15, 1987
He had ample time to seek legal advice prior to signing the instrument and was, even accepting plaintiff's…
Pitts v. RedmanVoluntariness is not diminished because self-representation may be second choice to new counsel. See Adams v.…