From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Brokers, Inc. v. Dept. of Agriculture

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 2, 1984
680 P.2d 702 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

CA A29682

Argued and submitted April 2, 1984

Dismissed May 2, 1984

Judicial Review from Department of Agriculture.

Robert G. Hawkins, Gresham, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

William F. Nessly, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appeal dismissed.


Because ORS 183.410 gives this court jurisdiction to review only binding declaratory rulings of agencies, we may not review respondent's denial of petitioner's request for a declaratory ruling. Fadeley v. Oregon Ethics Comm., 25 Or. App. 867, 870, 551 P.2d 496 (1976).

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

United Brokers, Inc. v. Dept. of Agriculture

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 2, 1984
680 P.2d 702 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

United Brokers, Inc. v. Dept. of Agriculture

Case Details

Full title:UNITED BROKERS, INC., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 2, 1984

Citations

680 P.2d 702 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
680 P.2d 702

Citing Cases

Forelaws on Board v. Energy Fac. Siting Council

The decision to refuse to give a ruling is not reviewable by a court. United Brokers, Inc. v. Department of…