From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Beauty Products, Inc. v. K$ Productions, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Mar 20, 2013
Civil Action C 12-05670 HRL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)

Opinion

          ROBERT D. WILSON (Pro hac vice), MICHAEL J. WILSON (Pro hac vice), Wilson & Wilson Co., L.P.A., Chagrin Falls, OH.

          SHELBY L. CLARK (CA Bar No. 203606), Abronson Law Offices, Los Gatos, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff United Beauty Products, Inc.

          Stephen D. Rothschild, Stephen D. Rothschild, Esq., Los Angeles, California, Attorney for Defendant.


          STIPULATED DISMISSAL JUDGMENT ENTRY

          HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff United Beauty Products, Inc. and Defendant K$ Productions, Inc. have informed the Court the parties have settled this matter.

         Upon representation of counsel that the above-captioned case has been settled between the parties, IT IS ORDERED the docket be marked for all:

         1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant as "settled and dismissed with prejudice, " with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs;

         FURTHER, the Court retains continuing jurisdiction to resolve disputes concerning the memorialization of this settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United Beauty Products, Inc. v. K$ Productions, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Mar 20, 2013
Civil Action C 12-05670 HRL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)
Case details for

United Beauty Products, Inc. v. K$ Productions, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED BEAUTY PRODUCTS, INC. Plaintiff, v. K$ PRODUCTIONS, INC. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Mar 20, 2013

Citations

Civil Action C 12-05670 HRL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)