From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Bank Ltd. v. Cambridge Sporting Goods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 1975
50 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

December 11, 1975


Motion insofar as it seeks reargument denied. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, is granted, and this court, pursuant to CPLR 5713, states that questions of law have arisen which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. Motion, insofar as it seeks to continue the stay granted by order of this court entered on December 2, 1975 is granted, with leave to petitioners-respondents to move to vacate the stay if the appeal is not perfected in accordance with the time requirements of the rules of the Court of Appeals. The request by petitioners-respondents for an undertaking is denied.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.


Summaries of

United Bank Ltd. v. Cambridge Sporting Goods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 1975
50 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

United Bank Ltd. v. Cambridge Sporting Goods

Case Details

Full title:UNITED BANK LIMITED et al., v. CAMBRIDGE SPORTING GOODS CORP

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)