From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 20, 2022
347 So. 3d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D21-2275

07-20-2022

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, a/a/o Gleybis Nodal Delgado, Appellee.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant. David B. Pakula, P.A. and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A. and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.


Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A. and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A. and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES, and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

United Automobile Insurance Company appeals the final judgment entered by the trial court after entry of summary judgment on the reasonableness of a diagnostic test based on the doctrine of collateral estoppel. We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 337 So.3d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) ("Millennium's ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.").

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 20, 2022
347 So. 3d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC

Case Details

Full title:UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jul 20, 2022

Citations

347 So. 3d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)