Opinion
No. 3D21-2276
07-20-2022
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, etc., Appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant. David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.
David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS and LINDSEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 337 So. 3d 834, 837 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) ("Millennium's ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.")
Reversed and remanded.