Opinion
No. 3D21-581
03-16-2022
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI, a/a/o Yoensy Polo, Appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant. David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); and Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.
David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); and Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY and HENDON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 337 So.3d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) ("Millennium's ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.").
Reversed and remanded.