Opinion
No. 3D21-2094
06-15-2022
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI, a/a/o Leonides N. Suarez, Appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant. Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale); David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines), for appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.
Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale); David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 337 So.3d 834, 837 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) ("Millennium's ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.").
Reversed and remanded.