Opinion
No. 3D21-207
03-16-2022
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, a/a/o Gregorio Hernandez-Rodriguez, Appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant. David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A, and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.
David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A, and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United Automobile Insurance Company v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 337 So.3d 834, 837 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) ("Millennium's ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.").