Opinion
No. 3D21-718
03-09-2022
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, a/a/o Serafin Jaramillo, Appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant. David B. Pakula, P.A. and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.
David B. Pakula, P.A. and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before LOGUE, HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United Automobile Insurance Company v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 337 So. 3d 834, 837 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) ("Millennium's ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.").