United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC

Full title: United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Millennium Radiology…

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Jul 20, 2022

No. 3D21-2273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 20, 2022)

Opinion

3D21-2273

07-20-2022

United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI, a/a/o Rosaly Bermudez, Appellee.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant. David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Lower Tribunal No. 12-15168 SP Natalie Moore, Judge.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand consistent with our decision in United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 337 So.3d 834, 837 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) ("Millennium's 'identity' is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.").