Opinion
No. 3D21-1347
04-06-2022
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant. David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Corredor & Husseini, P.A., and Maria E. Corredor, for appellee.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.
David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Corredor & Husseini, P.A., and Maria E. Corredor, for appellee.
Before EMAS, SCALES and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Doral Health Ctr., P.A. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 324 So. 3d 996, 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (affirming due to lack of preservation where appellant presented only deposition transcripts in opposition to summary judgment motions and did not otherwise provide sufficient record to discern whether arguments made on appeal were presented to trial court).