From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Am. v. Sheneman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Sep 30, 2014
Case No. 3:10-CR-120 JD (N.D. Ind. Sep. 30, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-CR-120 JD Case No. 3:10-CR-126 JD

09-30-2014

UNITED STATE OF AMERICA v. JEREMIE SHENEMAN


OPINION AND ORDER

Now before the Court are several motions relating to the defendant Jeremie Sheneman's motion under § 2255. After his conviction and sentence became final on appeal, Mr. Sheneman filed a motion under § 2255. At the Court's direction, he subsequently filed a declaration stating under penalty of perjury that the allegations in his petition were true and correct. [DE 216]. After receiving that declaration, the Court screened the § 2255 motion and set a briefing schedule.

Citations to the docket refer to the docket numbers in the 3:10-CR-120 case.

By a letter dated August 26, 2014, Mr. Sheneman moved to obtain the status of the briefing schedule. [DE 220]. This letter was likely mailed before Mr. Sheneman received the Court's order setting the briefing schedule, so his question has likely already been answered, but to avoid confusion, the Court GRANTS the motion and advises Mr. Sheneman of the status: The government's response to Mr. Sheneman's motion under § 2255 is currently due on October 27, 2014, and if Mr. Sheneman wishes to file a reply brief in support of his motion, he may do so by November 26, 2014.

Mr. Sheneman has also filed two requests for discovery. The first, dated August 26, 2014, seeks "the authentic applications in the government's possession" that were obtained by either the lender or the title company and that were fully signed by both the borrower and the loan officer. [DE 221]. The second request, dated September 22, 2014, seeks the 302 reports of interviews with various witnesses. [DE 222]. The government is ORDERED to respond to these requests by October 27, 2014, in conjunction with its response to Mr. Sheneman's § 2255 motion. Should the government object to these requests, Mr. Sheneman may file a reply brief in support of these motions in conjunction with his reply to his § 2255 motion, by November 26, 2014. If any further briefing or submissions as to the § 2255 motion are warranted in light of any discovery that may take place, the Court will invite those filings in a subsequent order.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: September 30, 2014

/s/ JON E. DEGUILIO

Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United Am. v. Sheneman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Sep 30, 2014
Case No. 3:10-CR-120 JD (N.D. Ind. Sep. 30, 2014)
Case details for

United Am. v. Sheneman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATE OF AMERICA v. JEREMIE SHENEMAN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Date published: Sep 30, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:10-CR-120 JD (N.D. Ind. Sep. 30, 2014)