From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uniroyal Tire Company v. Trujillo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 12, 2000
757 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D96-1411.

Opinion filed April 12, 2000. Rehearing denied May 24, 2000.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Juan Ramirez, Jr., Judge, L.T. No. 88-35399.

Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith Cutler and Wendy F. Lumish and Jeffrey A. Cohen, for appellants/cross-appellees.

Stabinski Funt; and Bambi G. Blum, for appellee/cross-appellant.

Before JORGENSON, COPE and SORONDO, JJ.


This appeal recurs upon a mandate issued by the Supreme Court of Florida on March 16, 2000. We vacate our previous opinion rendered on May 13, 1998, and recorded at 711 So.2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and conform in all respects to the opinion of the Supreme Court recorded at 25 Fla. L. Weekly S153 (Fla. Feb. 24, 2000).

As directed by that opinion and mandate, we now apply the principles announced in Brown v. Estate of Stuckey, 749 So.2d 450 (Fla. 1999), to the central contention raised by the defendants in this appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by granting an additur and/or new trial based upon its findings that the verdict was inconsistent and fundamentally improper. Accordingly, we affirm the order under review and remand the matter to the trial court for a new trial.

We adhere to our earlier determination that the plaintiff's cross-appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Uniroyal Tire Company v. Trujillo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 12, 2000
757 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Uniroyal Tire Company v. Trujillo

Case Details

Full title:UNIROYAL TIRE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, and GENERAL MOTORS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 12, 2000

Citations

757 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)