From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 26, 1975
322 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

Nos. 74-130, 74-131.

November 26, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, David Seth Walker, J.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Richard W. Seymour, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Charles Cleve Union appeals from separate convictions for robbery and using a firearm in the commission of a felony and consequent consecutive sentences.

From a careful review of the record herein we conclude that appellant has failed to make reversible error clearly to appear as regards the convictions herein. Accordingly, the judgments of guilt should be and they are hereby affirmed.

It is apparent, however, that the consecutive sentences are violative of the "single transaction" rationale confirmed in Cone v. State. In view whereof, the sentence for the robbery being proper as having been imposed on the higher offense, the cause must be remanded to the trial court with directions that he vacate and set aside the consecutive sentence for the separate offense of using a firearm in the commission of a felony.

(Fla. 1973), 285 So.2d 12.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

McNULTY, C.J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Union v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 26, 1975
322 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Union v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CLEVE UNION, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 26, 1975

Citations

322 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Farmer v. State

We agree that the concurrent sentence for attempted robbery was improper. See Cone v. State, Fla. 1973, 285…