From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Pac. R.R. v. Prologis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 2, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01248-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01248-RPM

09-02-2011

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, Plaintiff, v. PROLOGIS, Defendant.


Senior District Judge

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Bernique Abiakam

Torriano N. Garland

Lorna H. Horton

COURTROOM MINUTES

Scheduling Conference

10:01 a.m. Court in session.

Court's preliminary remarks.

10:05 a.m. Argument by Mr. Garland

10:17 a.m. Argument by Ms. Horton.
ORDERED:

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [11], is granted with respect to the

reasonableness of the settlement and denied in all other respects.
Counsel are instructed to confer to develop a discovery schedule on the limited issue of the condition of the railroad track at the time of the injury.
ORDERED:

Plaintiff's Motion to Quash and for Protective Order as to Depositions of Alice

Stigter, H. Ford Demming, Max Ferguson, Neil Scott and Scott Neumann [16], is

granted.

Counsel shall deliver in paper format a proposed scheduling order to include the issue of whether the parties waive jury demand directly to chamber by October 3, 2011.

10:26 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 25 min.


Summaries of

Union Pac. R.R. v. Prologis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 2, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01248-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Union Pac. R.R. v. Prologis

Case Details

Full title:UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, Plaintiff, v. PROLOGIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 2, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01248-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 2, 2011)