From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Winecup Gamble, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 22, 2023
3:17-cv-00477-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 22, 2023)

Opinion

3:17-cv-00477-LRH-CLB

08-22-2023

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. WINECUP GAMBLE, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant.


ORDER

LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 62 to Stay Execution of the Judgment. ECF No. 315. Defendant has not filed a response and the time to file any response has since passed. However, Plaintiff has stated that, “Union Pacific has conferred with Winecup about this motion and Winecup does not oppose Union Pacific's request for stay or the waiver of the bond requirement.” ECF No. 315, 2:10-12.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 62 to Stay Execution of the Judgment (ECF No. 315) is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that a stay of the fee and costs awards (ECF No. 313) without the requirement of a bond is GRANTED until 30 days after an appellate mandate is issued affirming the judgments.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Winecup Gamble, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 22, 2023
3:17-cv-00477-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Winecup Gamble, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 22, 2023

Citations

3:17-cv-00477-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 22, 2023)