From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Labor Life Ins. v. Fidelity Deposit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 1996
228 A.D.2d 244 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 11, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.).


Each term in the bond issued by the non-party surety, if not specifically defined in the bond, "should be given its plain, ordinary and proper meaning" ( Dupack v. Nationwide Leisure Corp., 73 A.D.2d 903, 905). So viewed, the language of the National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh bond excludes coverage of plaintiff's loss because the loss was not on a note "executed" by a "customer" of plaintiff. Thus, that bond does not constitute "other insurance" within the meaning of defendant's bond.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Union Labor Life Ins. v. Fidelity Deposit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 1996
228 A.D.2d 244 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Union Labor Life Ins. v. Fidelity Deposit

Case Details

Full title:UNION LABOR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 11, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 244 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 566

Citing Cases

Iron Workers v. Chamberlain

Since the term "labor" is not specifically defined in the Bond, this court is constrained to give the word…

Iron Workers Dist. Council of Western New York and Vicinity Welfare and Punsion Funds by Fedoriaka v. D.R. Chamberlain Corp.

In addition, they neither provided labor nor material "in the performance of the contract ...". Without…