From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

UNION GUARDIAN TRUST CO. v. ROOD

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 3, 1933
251 N.W. 309 (Mich. 1933)

Opinion

Docket No. 220, Calendar No. 36,897.

Submitted November 3, 1932.

Decided January 3, 1933. Submitted on rehearing May 11, 1933. Decided December 6, 1933.

Appeal from Wayne; Lamb (Fred S.), J., presiding. Submitted November 3, 1932. (Docket No. 220, Calendar No. 36,897.) Decided January 3, 1933. Submitted on rehearing May 11, 1933. Decided December 6, 1933.

Bill by Union Guardian Trust Company, a Michigan corporation, against John R. Rood and another to foreclose a mortgage. Decree for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. Affirmed, on rehearing.

Bulkley, Ledyard, Dickinson Wright, for plaintiff.

John R. Rood, for defendants.


ON REHEARING.


Upon careful consideration of the briefs filed on this rehearing by the respective parties, no reason appears for modifying our former decision. 261 Mich. 188. At the original hearing all parties agreed the purpose of this whole transaction was to give plaintiff a "mortgage" as security incident to a loan which it made to defendant John R. Rood. This security covered real estate owned by defendant. For that reason this court held that the mortgage lien must be foreclosed as a real estate mortgage rather than as a chattel mortgage. Under the circumstances involved in this case, we held the doctrine of equitable conversion is not applicable notwithstanding a portion of the mortgaged property was subject to prior contract of sale. The reason given for so holding was that application of that doctrine in the instant case "would accomplish a decidedly inequitable result." In so holding we are not departing from our former decisions in which the doctrine of equitable conversion has been applied, nor from our former decisions holding that under certain circumstances this doctrine should not be deemed applicable. Detroit Security Trust Co. v. Kramer, 247 Mich. 468. We reaffirm our former decision, without costs on this rehearing.

McDONALD, C.J., and POTTER, SHARPE, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred. FEAD, J., did not sit. CLARK, J., took no part in this decision.


Summaries of

UNION GUARDIAN TRUST CO. v. ROOD

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 3, 1933
251 N.W. 309 (Mich. 1933)
Case details for

UNION GUARDIAN TRUST CO. v. ROOD

Case Details

Full title:UNION GUARDIAN TRUST CO. v. ROOD

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jan 3, 1933

Citations

251 N.W. 309 (Mich. 1933)
251 N.W. 309

Citing Cases

Liebzeit v. Intercity State Bank (In re Blanchard)

Turning to the question of whether a land contract vendor's interest was mortgageable at common law, the…

Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Rood

Certain aspects of the litigation have already been adjudicated in this court. See Union Guardian Trust Co.…