From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Creosote and Oil Co. v. Aktiengesellschaft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

January, 1928


Order of October 14, 1927, denying defendants' motion to compel plaintiff to accept defendants' answer, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. We construe the order made by Mr. Justice Druhan on September 8, 1927, in which defendants were given leave to answer, as having been fully complied with by defendants in the service of their answer on October 1, 1927. ( Moore Co. v. Heymann, 207 App. Div. 416; Corporation of Scholes v. Ficke Warehouses, Inc., 204 id. 329.) This disposition requires a reversal upon the law and the facts, but without costs, of the orders denying defendants' motions to open the alleged default and to vacate the judgment entered thereon, and a granting of said motions, without costs. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Seeger, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Union Creosote and Oil Co. v. Aktiengesellschaft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Union Creosote and Oil Co. v. Aktiengesellschaft

Case Details

Full title:UNION CREOSOTE AND OIL COMPANY, Respondent, v. AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT "ADLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1928

Citations

222 App. Div. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)