From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union County Trust Co. v. Martin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 25, 1940
10 A.2d 650 (N.J. 1940)

Opinion

Submitted October 27, 1939 —

Decided January 25, 1940.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 121 N.J.L. 594, affirming a decree of the Prerogative Court made by Vice-Ordinary Buchanan, whose opinion is reported sub nom. In re Voorhees, 123 N.J. Eq. 142 .

For the prosecutor-appellant, Whittemore McLean and Sigurd A. Emerson.

For the defendant-respondent, David T. Wilentz and William A. Moore.

For New Jersey College for Women, Russell E. Watson.


The appeal in this case is from an affirmance in the Supreme Court of a decree of Vice-Ordinary Buchanan affirming a transfer tax assessment, In re Voorhees, 123 N.J. Eq. 142 . After a careful examination of the record and the briefs of counsel, we conclude that the determinations of the learned vice-ordinary as applied to the facts in this case are in accordance with the law of this state.

The judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Union County Trust Co. v. Martin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 25, 1940
10 A.2d 650 (N.J. 1940)
Case details for

Union County Trust Co. v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE TRANSFER INHERITANCE TAXES IN THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 25, 1940

Citations

10 A.2d 650 (N.J. 1940)
10 A.2d 650

Citing Cases

Morris v. Calvert

The lien attaches before any assessment is made, whereas by Section 15, Article VIII, ad valorem tax becomes…

Trustees of Rutgers College in N.J. v. Richman

" A contrary result to the Morgan case was reached under the particular facts of In re Voorhees' Estate, 123…