From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Bus Lines, Inc. v. Galarza

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 29, 1966
369 F.2d 402 (5th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 23518.

November 29, 1966.

Erich F. Klein, Jr., Dallas, Tex., H.H. Rankin, Jr., McAllen, Tex., Rankin, Kern Martinez, McAllen, Tex., Lyne, Klein French, Dallas, Tex., for appellants.

Carl H. Judin, Jr., Judin Cardenas, McAllen, Tex., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.


This belated attempt by appellants to oust the jurisdiction of the Federal court by insisting that the appellee's injured wife, a resident of the State of Texas, must be considered a party plaintiff, is based on too tenuous a reliance on the recent amendment to the Texas Married Womens Act, Art. 4618, Rev.Civil Stat.

The Judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Union Bus Lines, Inc. v. Galarza

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 29, 1966
369 F.2d 402 (5th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Union Bus Lines, Inc. v. Galarza

Case Details

Full title:UNION BUS LINES, INC., and Bobby Dee Wells, Appellants, v. Andres GALARZA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 29, 1966

Citations

369 F.2d 402 (5th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Thus, the action will not necessarily be brought in the name of the person who ultimately benefits from the…

McCormick Company v. Bedford Industries, Inc.

Defendants concede that plaintiff is a proper party to bring this suit and that McCormick Foods is not an…