From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Bank of Rochester v. Sherwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1898
31 App. Div. 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Opinion

June Term, 1898.


Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, and the following questions certified to that court, viz.: 1. Was the defendant Sherwood a bona fide purchaser for value, not having delivered all the notes of Bolton, which he agreed to deliver, prior to his receiving notice that the sale to him and Mrs. Bolton was claimed to be in fraud of creditors? 2. The trial court having found that said bill of sale of August 2, 1893, was fraudulent and void, in so far as it transferred property to Mrs. Bolton, does it follow, as a matter of law, from the findings and from the undisputed facts in the case, that said bill of sale was fraudulent as to both vendees named therein?


Summaries of

Union Bank of Rochester v. Sherwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1898
31 App. Div. 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for

Union Bank of Rochester v. Sherwood

Case Details

Full title:Union Bank of Rochester v. Frederick A. Sherwood, Impleaded, etc

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1898

Citations

31 App. Div. 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)