From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unidinial v. Manufacturers' Hanover

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 18, 1992
593 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-801.

February 18, 1992.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Harold Solomon, Judge.

Bienstock Associates; Hicks, Anderson Blum and Ralph O. Anderson, Miami, for appellant.

Kelley, Drye, Warren and Christian D. Keedy and Craig Olmstead, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.


Unidinial sued Manufacturers' Hanover Trust for mismanaging its discretionary investment portfolio. Manufacturers' Hanover was granted a summary judgment on its affirmative defense that Unidinial had ratified actions of Manufacturers' which violated the investment criteria established by the parties.

We agree with Unidinial that, on the ratification defense, Manufacturers' failed to show the nonexistence of issues of material fact. John Sawyer's Book Co. v. City Nat'l Bank of Miami, 542 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Specifically, there is a triable issue of fact whether Unidinial's failure to timely disapprove of Manufacturers' unauthorized transactions was caused by misrepresentations or material omissions of the defendant. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc. v. Cheng, 901 F.2d 1124 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Unidinial v. Manufacturers' Hanover

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 18, 1992
593 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Unidinial v. Manufacturers' Hanover

Case Details

Full title:UNIDINIAL MERCANTILE CORPORATION, A PANAMANIAN CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 18, 1992

Citations

593 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)