Neither the request for finding nor any part of the draft finding appears in the record as printed. It is impossible, therefore, to consider any of the assignments of error or to make any corrections in the finding. Practice Book ยง 397; Ungiechajer v. Matzsezk, 148 Conn. 724, 725, 169 A.2d 27.
The fourth assignment of error concerns the failure of the court to arrive at the conclusion that the transaction was a loan. The conclusion of fact which the plaintiff seeks to have added to the finding is without support in the subordinate facts and consequently cannot be added. Ungiechajer v. Matzsezk, 148 Conn. 724, 725. In the next assignment of error, the claim is made that the court stated that the $400 sum was carried on the defendant's books as a loan, but a search of not only the finding but the entire record as well reveals no such statement by the court.