Opinion
2:21-CV-01766-GMN-NJK
11-09-2022
ANGELA UNDERWOOD, Personal Representative for the Estate of Tyler Underwood, Plaintiff, v. O'REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC d/b/a O'Reilly Auto Parts, Inc., ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Pennzoil Quaker State Company d/b/a Gumout, THE BLASTER CORPORATION, CRC INDUSTRIES, INC., SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC., HIGHLAND STORES, INC. d/b/a Bi-Rite Markets, BI-RITE MARKETS, INC., 7-ELEVEN, INC., RICHARD A. HALEY, AUTOZONE STORES, LLC. f/k/a Autozone Stores, Inc., AMREP, INC., ADVANCE STORES COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Individually and as Successor in Interest to and d/b/a CarQuest Auto Parts, ASHLAND, LLC, Individually and as Successor In Interest to and d/b/a Valvoline, CALUMET BRANDED PRODUCTS, LLC f/k/a Calumet Packaging, LLC, SUNNYSIDE CORPORATION, W.M. BARR & COMPANY, INC., TECHNICAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, RM MARKETS, INC., OMNI INDUSTRIES, L.L.C, f/k/a Omni Industries, Inc., OMNI SPECIALTY PACKAGING, L.L.C, f/k/a Omni Specialty Packaging, Inc., AMALIE OIL COMPANY, CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, and TOWER ENERGY, Defendants.
BRUCE SCOTT DICKINSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 002297 THORNDAL, ARMSTRONG, DELK, BALENBUSH & EISINGER Attorneys for Defendant Amalie Oil Company LOCK LAW FIRM Andrew J. Dupont. Esq. Cliff W. Marcek, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5061 CLIFF W. MARCEK, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Angela Underwood
BRUCE SCOTT DICKINSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 002297
THORNDAL, ARMSTRONG, DELK, BALENBUSH & EISINGER
Attorneys for Defendant Amalie Oil Company
LOCK LAW FIRM
Andrew J. Dupont. Esq.
Cliff W. Marcek, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5061
CLIFF W. MARCEK, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Angela Underwood
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR AMALIE OIL COMPANY TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1 (a), Plaintiff, ANGELA UNDERWOOD, and Defendant, AMALIE OIL COMPANY, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to allow AMALIE OIL COMPANY until and including November 14, 2022 to file its response to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint.
In support of this stipulation and order pursuant to the court's November 3, 2022 order, the reasons for this stipulation are: Amalie and its counsel are located in Tampa, Florida. When Amalie I was served on Friday October 7, 2022, this case had been pending for over a year, it included approximately 20 parties, and the court file contained 205 docket entries, including legal memoranda on pertinent issues, court orders, and transcripts of two days of the plaintiffs deposition. Amalie and its counsel reasonably require the requested extension to review the court file, locate and retain local counsel in Las Vegas, make a reasonable investigation of the facts, and prepare and file a response to the Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.