From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Underwood v. Mayes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2022
2:22-cv-0694 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0694 DB P

11-15-2022

ERROL LOVELL UNDERWOOD, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT MAYES, Defendant.


ORDER

DEBOFAH BARNES UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Mayes, a physician, gave him an injection of the COVID-19 vaccine without his consent or knowledge. On November 14, 2022, defendant filed a motion to opt out of the post-screening ADR project. Defendant's counsel states that he has reviewed plaintiff's claim, discussed it with his supervisor, and spoke with plaintiff on the telephone about the claim and the damages plaintiff seeks. Counsel feels that the parties' positions are currently too far apart to engage in productive settlement negotiations. This court finds good cause to grant defendant's motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion to opt out (ECF No. 20) is granted and the stay of this action is lifted; and

2. Within twenty-one days from the date of this order, defendant shall file a responsive pleading.


Summaries of

Underwood v. Mayes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2022
2:22-cv-0694 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Underwood v. Mayes

Case Details

Full title:ERROL LOVELL UNDERWOOD, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT MAYES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 15, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-0694 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)