From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Underwood v. Daniele

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Feb 25, 2003
98 S.W.3d 876 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81818

February 25, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Kenneth M. Romines, Judge.

William Arnold Hellmich II, King, Krehbiel, Hellmich, Hentz Borbonus Law Offices, St. Louis, MO, for Appellants.

Eric David Martin, Blackwell, Sanders, Peper Martin, Law Offices, St. Louis, MO, for Respondents.

Before William H. Crandall, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Glenn A. Norton, J.



ORDER


Anthony D. Daniele and Beth A. Daniele (collectively Appellants) appeal from a judgment quieting title in a 2.1-acre tract of land (2.1-acre tract) in favor of Respondents Brian C. Underwood (Underwood) and Carol S. Hunt (Hunt) and permanently enjoining Appellants from using Vision View Spring Lake (the Lake) and its surrounding property, which borders the southern edge of Appellants' property.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). Further, the trial court's judgment does not erroneously declare the law, nor does it erroneously apply the law. Id. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Underwood v. Daniele

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Feb 25, 2003
98 S.W.3d 876 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Underwood v. Daniele

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN C. UNDERWOOD, CAROL S. HUNT, CHERYL A. ANDREWS, WARMANN FAMILY…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Feb 25, 2003

Citations

98 S.W.3d 876 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)