From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Oct 4, 1967
385 F.2d 834 (7th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 16035.

October 4, 1967.

Norman Lettvin, Edwin S. Booth, Bair, Freeman Molinare, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.

Granger Cook, Jr., Chicago, Ill., John A. Blair, Detroit, Mich., Hume, Clement, Hume Lee, Chicago, Ill., for defendant-appellee, Robert L. Boynton, Harness, Dickey Pierce, Detroit, Mich., of counsel.

Before SCHNACKENBERG, CASTLE and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges.


This patent infringement suit involves the validity of Patent No. 3,168,055 for a railroad freight-car bulkhead. We agree with the conclusion of the District Court that the alleged invention was obvious within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103. See 275 F. Supp. 331. Therefore, the judgment invalidating this patent is affirmed.


I concur in the foregoing opinion because of the reasons stated therefor and also because the district court in its opinion distinguished the case of Copease Mfg. Co. v. American Photocopy Equipment Co., 7 Cir., 298 F.2d 772 (1961).


Summaries of

Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Oct 4, 1967
385 F.2d 834 (7th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products Co.

Case Details

Full title:UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EVANS PRODUCTS COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Oct 4, 1967

Citations

385 F.2d 834 (7th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products Co.

This is an appeal from the District Court's denial of plaintiff's motion for a new trial. The original…

McCully v. Radack

GILBERT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. History is uncertain whether William Arthur Dunkerly ever…