From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Un Named v. Un Named

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Jul 16, 2019
MC 19-6-M-DWM (D. Mont. Jul. 16, 2019)

Opinion

MC 19-6-M-DWM

07-16-2019

[UN NAMED], Plaintiff, v. [UN NAMED], Defendant.


ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered Findings and Recommendation in this matter on June 21, 2019. There have been no objections and therefore the parties are not entitled to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). This Court will review the Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach. Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000).

Judge Lynch recommended this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. I find no clear error in Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 2), and I adopt them in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

DATED this 16th day of July, 2019.

/s/_________

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Un Named v. Un Named

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Jul 16, 2019
MC 19-6-M-DWM (D. Mont. Jul. 16, 2019)
Case details for

Un Named v. Un Named

Case Details

Full title:[UN NAMED], Plaintiff, v. [UN NAMED], Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

Date published: Jul 16, 2019

Citations

MC 19-6-M-DWM (D. Mont. Jul. 16, 2019)