From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Umphfrey v. Hardy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 5, 2013
Case No. 4:09 CV 1666 RWS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 4:09 CV 1666 RWS

03-05-2013

THOMAS L. UMPHFREY, Petitioner, v. MARCUS HARDY and CHRIS KOSTER, Respondents.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before me on the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Thomas L. Umphfrey. I referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton for a report and recommendation on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On January 16, 2013, Judge Blanton filed his recommendation that Umphfrey's habeas petition should be denied.

Objections to Judge Blanton's Report and Recommendation were due to be filed by January 30, 2013. As of the date of this order, Umphfrey has not filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation. After careful consideration, I will adopt and sustain the thorough reasoning of Judge Blanton's report and I will deny Umphfrey's habeas petition for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation dated January 16, 2013.

I have also considered whether to issue a certificate of appealability. To grant a certificate of appealability, the Court must find a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. See Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d 518, 522 (8th Cir. 1997). A substantial showing is a showing that issues are debatable among reasonable jurists, a court could resolve the issues differently, or the issues deserve further proceedings. Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997) (citing Flieger v. Delo, 16 F.3d 878, 882-83 (8th Cir. 1994). Because petitioner has not made such a showing in this case, I will not issue a certificate of appealability.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Blanton's Report and Recommendation filed on January 16, 2013 is adopted and sustained in its entirety.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Thomas L. Umphfrey's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability.

A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date.

________________________

RODNEY W. SIPPEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Umphfrey v. Hardy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 5, 2013
Case No. 4:09 CV 1666 RWS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Umphfrey v. Hardy

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS L. UMPHFREY, Petitioner, v. MARCUS HARDY and CHRIS KOSTER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

Case No. 4:09 CV 1666 RWS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 5, 2013)