Summary
In Ultimate Med. Supplies v. Lancer Ins. Co., 7 Misc 3d 1002 [A] [Civ.Ct., Kings. Co. 2004], Defendant's medical Doctor testified that based on her experience, none of the medical equipment prescribed were necessary. The Court found it clear that the Doctor admitted to never having prescribed any of the subject medical equipment, thus the Court held that the Doctor's opinion was biased against the prescribing Doctor so as to make the peer review a nullity and not credible.
Summary of this case from DELTA MED. SUPPLIES, INC. v. NY CENT. MUT. INS.Opinion
December 17, 2004.
Insurance — No-Fault Automobile Insurance.