From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ullmann v. Olwine

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 10, 1991
951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir. 1991)

Summary

explaining abuse of discretion standard applied to appeals of Rule 52(b) orders and noting National Metal Finishing Co.

Summary of this case from Nisus Corporation v. Perma-Chink Systems, Inc.

Opinion

No. 91-3334.

December 10, 1991.

S.D.Ohio.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Ullmann v. Olwine

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 10, 1991
951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir. 1991)

explaining abuse of discretion standard applied to appeals of Rule 52(b) orders and noting National Metal Finishing Co.

Summary of this case from Nisus Corporation v. Perma-Chink Systems, Inc.
Case details for

Ullmann v. Olwine

Case Details

Full title:Ullmann v. Olwine, Connelly, Chase, O'Donnell and Weyher

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 1991

Citations

951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Watson

The bill uses 1,000 plants as the equivalent of 1,000 kilograms.United States v. Lewis, 762 F. Supp. 1314,…

U.S. v. Shields

. The government contends, relying on United States v. Lewis, 762 F. Supp. 1314 (E.D.Tenn.), aff'd, 951 F.2d…