From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ukaj v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 2007
969 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 5D07-2443.

November 30, 2007.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Bob LeBlanc, Judge.

Kmata Ukaj, Ocala, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Appellant challenges the denial of her motion to reduce sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The lower court erroneously denied the motion as untimely, even though it had been timely filed within sixty days after the mandate issued in the direct appeal. Although appeals from orders such as this are generally not cognizable, because the lower court was of the mistaken impression that the motion was untimely, we treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari, grant the petition and quash the order under review. Diaz v. State, 931 So.2d 1002, 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Byrd v. State, 920 So.2d 825, 826 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). On remand, the trial court is directed to address the motion on the merits.

ORDER QUASHED; CASE REMANDED.

PLEUS, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ukaj v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 2007
969 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Ukaj v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kmata UKAJ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 30, 2007

Citations

969 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Graham v. State

However, when the basis for denial was a lack of jurisdiction, certiorari is proper for purposes of…

Eberheart v. State

We, therefore, grant the petition for writ of certiorari, quash the order and remand for further proceedings.…