From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uhlfelder v. Tamsen

City Court of New York, General Term
Jun 1, 1896
17 Misc. 296 (N.Y. City Ct. 1896)

Opinion

June, 1896.

Jacob Barnett, for appellant.

Burritt Stone and Arthur Furber, for respondents.


The part of the order appealed from should be reversed.

The discretion referred to in Hart v. Kohn, 12 Misc. 648; 33 N.Y.S. 272, was a determination as to whether the party had an interest. Here that question has been determined in favor of the applicant, and section 452 of the Code of Civil Procedure is mandatory that, where the applicant has an interest, the court must direct him to be brought in. Rosenberg v. Salomon, 144 N.Y. 92.

That part of the order appealed from is reversed, with costs.

VAN WYCK, Ch. J., concurs.

Portion of order appealed from reversed, with costs.


Summaries of

Uhlfelder v. Tamsen

City Court of New York, General Term
Jun 1, 1896
17 Misc. 296 (N.Y. City Ct. 1896)
Case details for

Uhlfelder v. Tamsen

Case Details

Full title:SIMON UHLFELDER et al., Respondents, v . EDWARD J.H. TAMSEN, as Sheriff…

Court:City Court of New York, General Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1896

Citations

17 Misc. 296 (N.Y. City Ct. 1896)
40 N.Y.S. 372

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Winn

Code 1923, § 7249; Ex parte Shuptrine, 204 Ala. 111, 85 So. 494; Ex parte Blackburn, 204 Ala. 132, 85 So.…