From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uher v. Toys “R” Us

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 2002
292 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-10611

Argued December 7, 2001.

March 25, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), entered October 12, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

John J. Guadagno, East Islip, N.Y. (Joseph R. D'Addario of counsel), for appellants.

Chesney Murphy, LLP (Lysaght Russo, P.C., Rockville Centre, N.Y. [Michelle S. Russo] of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, and ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs' contention that the jury verdict should be set aside as inconsistent is unpreserved for appellate review, since they did not raise that issue before the jury was discharged (see Barry v. Manglass, 55 N.Y.2d 803, 806; Clements v. Lindsey, 237 A.D.2d 557).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, O'BRIEN and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Uher v. Toys “R” Us

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 2002
292 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Uher v. Toys “R” Us

Case Details

Full title:KEITH UHER, ET AL., appellants, v. TOYS R; US, ETC., respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 599

Citing Cases

Lockhart v. Adirondack Transit Lines

The only meritorious issue raised on appeal by any party concerns the posttrial motions to set aside the…

Delacruz v. Galaxy Electronics

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The plaintiffs' contention that…