From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uduko v. Cozzens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 16, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 11-13765 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 11-13765

11-16-2012

OKECHUKWU UDUKO, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN E. COZZENS, et al., Defendants.


HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS


ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants' motion requesting that Plaintiff's in forma pauperis ("IFP") status be revoked because Plaintiff has "three strikes" under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (Doc. # 31). The provision known as the "three-strikes" rule states:

In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under [the section governing proceedings in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

On September 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation denying Defendants' motion. Plaintiff and Defendants filed objections.

This Court reviews de novo any part of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on a dispositive motion that is properly objected to. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). After careful review of the entire record, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusions. The Magistrate Judge's thorough Report and Recommendation lays out the facts and procedural history of the case, as well as the relevant case law, and denies Defendants' claim with a reasoned explanation for his holding.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED.

_______________

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record and Okechukwu Uduko by electronic means or U.S. Mail on November 16, 2012. Linda Vertriest
Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Uduko v. Cozzens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 16, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 11-13765 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Uduko v. Cozzens

Case Details

Full title:OKECHUKWU UDUKO, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN E. COZZENS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 11-13765 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 16, 2012)

Citing Cases

Streets v. United States

See Exhibits to Return of Writ. A court is not required to scour a voluminous record in to ascertain the…

Speer v. United States

This Court need not scour through the voluminous record in this case to ascertain the basis for Petitioner's…