From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uddin v. Worsham

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 23, 2014
NO. 01-14-00949-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 23, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 01-14-00949-CV

12-23-2014

DR. SHAKEEL UDDIN, Appellant v. LORETTA WORSHAM, Appellee


On Appeal from the 333rd Judicial District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2011-13002

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Dr. Shakeel Uddin, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer wishes to pursue it and requests that all costs be assessed against the party incurring the same. Although there is no certificate of conference, this motion has been on file with the Court for more than 10 days and no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal, with costs to be taxed against the party who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (d), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.


Summaries of

Uddin v. Worsham

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 23, 2014
NO. 01-14-00949-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Uddin v. Worsham

Case Details

Full title:DR. SHAKEEL UDDIN, Appellant v. LORETTA WORSHAM, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Dec 23, 2014

Citations

NO. 01-14-00949-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 23, 2014)