From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uddin v. Attorney Gen. of the United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Sep 25, 2017
No. 17-1056 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1056

09-25-2017

JOSHIM UDDIN, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent


(Agency No. 208-059-346) Present: GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ and RENDELL, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Respondent to Amend Opinion dated September 6, 2017.

Respectfully,

Clerk/tmm ORDER The foregoing motion is granted. The opinion at page 20, first paragraph, last sentence which reads: "As long as the agency finds as a matter of fact that the allegedly terroristic acts were authorized by party leaders, we review that determination for clear error." is amended to read instead: "As long as the agency finds as a matter of fact that the allegedly terroristic acts were authorized by party leaders, we will accept that finding if supported by substantial evidence." An amended opinion will be issued. As this change does not alter the Court's disposition, judgment entered by the Court will not be amended.

By the Court,

s/ MARJORIE O. RENDELL

Circuit Judge Dated: September 25, 2017
tmm/cc: Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, Esq.
Daniel I. Smulow, Esq.


Summaries of

Uddin v. Attorney Gen. of the United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Sep 25, 2017
No. 17-1056 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2017)
Case details for

Uddin v. Attorney Gen. of the United States

Case Details

Full title:JOSHIM UDDIN, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 25, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1056 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2017)