Opinion
2012-03-29
In the Matter of Paulette Y. UCCI, Respondent, v. David G. UCCI, Appellant.
Mitch Kessler, Cohoes, for appellant. Tully Rinckey, P.L.L.C., Albany (Lori N. Bovee of counsel), for respondent.
Mitch Kessler, Cohoes, for appellant. Tully Rinckey, P.L.L.C., Albany (Lori N. Bovee of counsel), for respondent. Christopher Obstarczyk, Albany, attorney for the children.
Before: PETERS, J.P., ROSE, LAHTINEN, STEIN and GARRY, JJ.
GARRY, J.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Albany County (M.Walsh, J.), entered October 20, 2010, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, denied respondent's motion to vacate a prior order of custody and visitation.
The parties are the parents of two children (born in 2001 and 2003). In September 2010, Family Court entered an order of custody based upon their in-court stipulation. Respondent (hereinafter the father) thereafter moved for an order vacating the prior order. The court denied this application by a decision and order dated October 19, 2010. The decision and order was entered and copies were mailed by the court to counsel for all parties on the following day, October 20, 2010. The father thereafter filed a notice of appeal dated June 20, 2011.
Family Ct Act article 11 governs this proceeding. Family Court's decision and order bore the requisite statutory language advising as to the time limitations for appeal “in conspicuous print,” as well as the notation regarding the mailing by the court (Family Ct Act § 1113). The appeal was untimely; in the circumstances presented, Family Ct Act § 1113 required that the appeal be taken within 35 days, and this did not occur. In contrast to criminal cases, where the governing statute affords a limited discretion for extensions of time ( see CPL 460.30), the time bar in this matter is absolute. This Court lacks jurisdiction to proceed ( see Matter of Kevin C. v. Claudia C., 90 A.D.3d 1161, 933 N.Y.S.2d 913 [2011]; Matter of Deandre GG. [Charlice HH.], 79 A.D.3d 1384, 1385, 912 N.Y.S.2d 801 [2010], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 708, 921 N.Y.S.2d 188, 946 N.E.2d 176 [2011]; Matter of Alexis BB., 285 A.D.2d 751, 752, 727 N.Y.S.2d 662 [2001] ).
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.