From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uber Techs. v. Doe

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 9, 2023
No. A24D0124 (Ga. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2023)

Opinion

A24D0124

11-09-2023

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al. v. JANE DOE.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

In this civil action, the trial court entered an order granting the plaintiff's motion for a default judgment as to liability only against defendants Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber USA, LLC, and Rasier, LLC (collectively, the "Applicants"). The order explicitly provided that, because damages are unliquidated, the matter must be set for a damages hearing. The Applicants thereafter filed a motion to set aside the default judgment and open default. The trial court denied the motion, and the Applicants filed this application for discretionary review. We lack jurisdiction.

A default judgment as to liability only is not a final judgment. See Cryomedics, Inc. v. Smith, 180 Ga.App. 336, 337-338 (349 S.E.2d 223) (1986). Consequently, this case remains pending before the trial court. The Applicants therefore were required to use the interlocutory appeal procedures - including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court - to appeal the denial of their motion to set aside the default judgment and open default. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga.App. 435, 435 (383 S.E.2d 906) (1989) (an application for interlocutory review is required to appeal a trial court order entered in a case that remains pending before the trial court). Their failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this application, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 S.E.2d 213) (1996).


Summaries of

Uber Techs. v. Doe

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 9, 2023
No. A24D0124 (Ga. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Uber Techs. v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al. v. JANE DOE.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 9, 2023

Citations

No. A24D0124 (Ga. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2023)