Opinion
Civil Action 23-3780
08-23-2024
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff v. KEVIN BODDIE, Defendant
ORDER
MURPHY J.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of August 2024, upon consideration of Uber's Petition to Compel Arbitration (DI 1), Uber's Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition to Compel Arbitration (DI 3), Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission's Motion to Intervene as Defendant (DI 7) and all attachments and responses thereto, and Defendant Kevin Boddie's Motion to Dismiss (DI 30) and all responses thereto, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission's Motion to Intervene as Defendant (DI 7) is GRANTED.
a. The Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to add Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission as a Defendant in the above-captioned action.
b. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission's Motion to Dismiss and all attachments thereto (DI 7-3, 7-4, 7-5) are DEEMED FILED.
2. Defendant Kevin Boddie's Motion to Dismiss (DI 30) and Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission's Motion to Dismiss (DI 7-3) are GRANTED.
3. The Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to mark this case closed for all purposes, including statistics.