From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ubaldi v. SLM Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-01320 EDL (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-01320 EDL

10-18-2011

TINA M. UBALDI, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SLM CORPORATION, d/b/a SALLIE MAE, INC., d/b/a SALLIE MAE SERVICING, a Delaware corporation Defendant.

Janet Lindner Spielberg (SBN 221926) LAW OFFICES OF JANET LINDNER SPIELBERG Michael D. Braun (SBN 167416) BRAUN LAW GROUP, P.C. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF Joseph N. Kravec, Jr. (admitted pro hac ) Edward J. Feinstein ( pro hac to be filed) STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE & PAYNE, LLC William J. Genego (SBN 103224) NASATIR, HIRSCH, PODBERESKY KHERO & GENEGO STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP JULIA B. STRICKLAND LISA M. SIMONETTI DAVID W. MOON David W. Moon Attorneys for Defendant SLM Corporation


Janet Lindner Spielberg (SBN 221926)

LAW OFFICES OF JANET LINDNER

SPIELBERG

Michael D. Braun (SBN 167416)

BRAUN LAW GROUP, P.C.

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Joseph N. Kravec, Jr. (admitted pro hac)

Edward J. Feinstein (pro hac to be filed)

STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE

& PAYNE, LLC

William J. Genego (SBN 103224)

NASATIR, HIRSCH, PODBERESKY

KHERO & GENEGO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS AS MODIFIED

WHEREAS, on October 7, 2011, Defendant SLM Corporation filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), which is set for hearing on November 29, 2011;

WHEREAS, due to scheduling conflicts with the current hearing date and briefing schedule, the Parties have agreed to continue the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and to adjust the briefing schedule accordingly;

WHEREAS, there have been two prior extensions of time granting Defendant additional time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 8), and continuing the hearing on Defendant's motion to dismiss and granting the Parties additional time to file responsive and reply briefs (Doc. 22); and

WHEREAS, this Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, as follows:

(a) The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to December 13, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom E;
(b) Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion shall be filed and served by November 4, 2011; and
(c) Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition shall be filed and served by November 29, 2011.

LAW OFFICE OF JANET LINDNER SPIELBERG

Janet Lindner Spielberg

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

JULIA B. STRICKLAND LISA M. SIMONETTI

DAVID W. MOON

David W. Moon

Attorneys for Defendant SLM Corporation

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte


Summaries of

Ubaldi v. SLM Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-01320 EDL (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Ubaldi v. SLM Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TINA M. UBALDI, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-01320 EDL (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)