From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U. S. v. Lindblad

United States District Court, C.D. California
Apr 24, 2009
NO. CR-05-206-RHW-2 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2009)

Opinion

NO. CR-05-206-RHW-2.

April 24, 2009


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DELAYED MEMORANDUM OF LAW


Before the Court is Defendant's Amended Motion for Leave to File Delayed Memorandum of Law (Ct. Rec. 149). The motion was heard without oral argument.

On April 10, 2009, the Court granted Defendant's request to file a delayed memorandum. Defendant was ordered to file a memorandum within sixty days from that date. On April 21, 2009, Defendant filed an amended motion asking for an additional 90 days. Defendant indicates he needs the additional time due to his prison work schedule, federal holidays, and law library hours limit his access to the library. The Court finds that good cause exists to grant the motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

1. Defendant's Amended Motion for Leave to File Delayed Memorandum of Law (Ct. Rec. 149) is GRANTED.

2. Within 90 days from the date of this Order, Defendant is directed to file his accompanying memorandum to his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and forward copies to counsel.


Summaries of

U. S. v. Lindblad

United States District Court, C.D. California
Apr 24, 2009
NO. CR-05-206-RHW-2 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2009)
Case details for

U. S. v. Lindblad

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL LINDBLAD, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 24, 2009

Citations

NO. CR-05-206-RHW-2 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2009)