From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U-Haul Co. of Nevada Inc. v. Kamer

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 27, 2010
2:06-cv-618-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 27, 2010)

Opinion

2:06-cv-618-RCJ-PAL.

December 27, 2010


ORDER


This case returns to the Court as a result of a partial remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Currently before the Court is a Motion for Reconsideration (#70) filed by Plaintiffs before they appealed. In light of the Ninth Circuit's opinion (#92), the Court denies, as moot, Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. Additionally, pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's opinion, the Court reinstates Plaintiffs' claims against Nathan Albright, Debra Wilcher, and Kamer Zucker Abbott.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (#70) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' claims against Nathan Albright, Debra Wilcher, and Kamer Zucker Abbott are hereby reinstated.

DATED: December 27, 2010


Summaries of

U-Haul Co. of Nevada Inc. v. Kamer

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 27, 2010
2:06-cv-618-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 27, 2010)
Case details for

U-Haul Co. of Nevada Inc. v. Kamer

Case Details

Full title:U-HAUL CO. OF NEVADA INC., a Nevada corporation; and U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Dec 27, 2010

Citations

2:06-cv-618-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 27, 2010)