From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Mar 1, 2005
No. 14-03-00453-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 1, 2005)

Opinion

No. 14-03-00453-CR

Memorandum Opinion filed March 1, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 337th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 906,330. Affirmed.

Panel consists of Chief Justice HEDGES and Justices EDELMAN and SEYMORE.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Dwayne Tyson appeals a conviction for aggravated robbery on the ground that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash the indictment because it failed to identify what kind of property he was accused of taking in the robbery. Although appellant's motion to quash asserted generally that the indictment did not provide sufficient notice of the charged offense, it did not indicate how or in what respect(s) the indictment failed to give such notice. Nor have we found any other portion of the record where appellant requested or obtained a ruling from the trial court on the indictment's failure to describe the property that was the subject of the offense. Accordingly, the complaint he raises on appeal presents nothing for our review, appellant's two issues are overruled, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Tyson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Mar 1, 2005
No. 14-03-00453-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 1, 2005)
Case details for

Tyson v. State

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE ANDRE TYSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Mar 1, 2005

Citations

No. 14-03-00453-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 1, 2005)