From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyson v. Nazarian

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 18, 2012
982 N.E.2d 614 (N.Y. 2012)

Opinion

2012-12-18

Michel D. TYSON, Appellant, v. Lawrence NAZARIAN, Respondent.

Davison Law Office, PLLC, Canandaigua (Mark C. Davison of counsel), for appellant. Burgio, Kita & Curvin, Buffalo (Hilary C. Banker of counsel), for respondent.


Davison Law Office, PLLC, Canandaigua (Mark C. Davison of counsel), for appellant. Burgio, Kita & Curvin, Buffalo (Hilary C. Banker of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying defendant's motion for summary judgment and remitting to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum, and, as so modified, affirmed.

Sufficient record evidence exists to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiff suffered a “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) ( see Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 957, 582 N.Y.S.2d 990, 591 N.E.2d 1176 [1992] ). In view of its disposition, the Appellate Division did not address plaintiff's contention that she is entitled to summary judgment on the issue of defendant's negligence. We therefore remit for that purpose. Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH and PIGOTT concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order modified, without costs, by denying defendant's motion for summary judgment and remitting to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.


Summaries of

Tyson v. Nazarian

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 18, 2012
982 N.E.2d 614 (N.Y. 2012)
Case details for

Tyson v. Nazarian

Case Details

Full title:Michel D. TYSON, Appellant, v. Lawrence NAZARIAN, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Dec 18, 2012

Citations

982 N.E.2d 614 (N.Y. 2012)
982 N.E.2d 614
958 N.Y.S.2d 694
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8673

Citing Cases

Linnane v. Szabo

We therefore modify the order by denying plaintiff's motion with respect to the left knee and granting…