Opinion
Nos. 2020-00819 2023-03581 2023-09588 2023-09592 2023-10011 Index No. 526071/2020
12-27-2023
Shawn Tyson, respondent, v. Alpha Diallo, et al., defendants, Uber Technologies Inc., et al., appellants. Shawn Tyson, respondent, v. Alpha Diallo, et al., defendants, Uber Technologies Inc., et al., appellants. Shawn Tyson, respondent, v. Alpha Diallo, et al., defendants, Uber Technologies Inc., et al., appellants. Shawn Tyson, respondent, v. Alpha Diallo, et al., defendants, Uber Technologies Inc., et al., appellants. Shawn Tyson, respondent, v. Alpha Diallo, et al., defendants, Uber Technologies Inc., et al., appellants.
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
M293261
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., DEBORAH A. DOWLING, HELEN VOUTSINAS, LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION
Appeals from five orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 20, 2022, February 16, 2023, June 7, 2023, July 3, 2023, and September 7, 2023, respectively. Separate applications by Michael Robert Huston, an attorney in good standing in the District of Columbia, to be admitted pro hac vice to represent the appellants on the appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the applications are granted.
DILLON, J.P., DOWLING, VOUTSINAS and VENTURA, JJ., concur.