From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyrell v. Hoffman

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 24, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-2855 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-2855 JAM KJN P.

May 24, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 18, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 18, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's December 15, 2010 motion to reopen the appeal period (Dkt. No. 44) is denied.


Summaries of

Tyrell v. Hoffman

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 24, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-2855 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Tyrell v. Hoffman

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN REGENT TYRELL, Petitioner, v. THOMAS G. HOFFMAN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 24, 2011

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-2855 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 24, 2011)