From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyra v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 14, 2019
No. 77835-COA (Nev. App. Mar. 14, 2019)

Opinion

No. 77835-COA

03-14-2019

DANIELLE TYRA, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and JASON PAUL VANBUREN, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus.

The petition is titled "Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and quo warranto and Rehearing Original Proceedings," however, the petition is only properly presented as one for mandamus relief and therefore, is treated solely as a petition for a writ of mandamus. And even if it could be viewed as properly seeking quo warranto relief, petitioner has failed to identify any basis on which such relief would be warranted. --------

A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act that the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. See NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). A writ of mandamus will not issue, however, if the petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law, See NRS 34.170; Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. Further, mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, and it is within the discretion of this court to determine if a petition will be considered. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the documents before us, we conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that extraordinary writ relief is warranted. See id. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Bulla cc: Hon. T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., District Judge, Family Court Division

Danielle Tyra

Michael A. Root

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Tyra v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 14, 2019
No. 77835-COA (Nev. App. Mar. 14, 2019)
Case details for

Tyra v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:DANIELLE TYRA, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 14, 2019

Citations

No. 77835-COA (Nev. App. Mar. 14, 2019)